Thoughts on Hebrews Study Questions from 9/24

THOUGHTS ON HEBREWS STUDY QUESTIONS

My Sunday School Life Group is studying Hebrews. Every Monday, I post questions that were discussed the day before in Sunday School. I invite you to ponder/think about them and jot down your thoughts.

On Wednesdays, I post some of the ideas that came up in the Life Group's discussion for you to consider and compare with your thoughts.  

These questions were discussed in my Life Group Monday. This post presents thoughts from the class discussion.

Chapter 7Vv 1-10

What 2 titles does Mel hold?
1) King of Salem/King of Righteousness/King of Peace. 
2) Priest of the Most High God.

How could Mel be a High Priest when the priesthood hadn’t been established yet?
God appointed him. He was the first High Priest.
Later priests were descendants of Levi. Mel had no beginning and no end. Melchizedek is a "type" of Jesus, not the pre-incarnate Jesus. 
We spent a  long of time here. I've put some of the points with other questions because they fit better there. Here the answer to the question about Mel being Jesus from https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/356-was-melchizedek-the-preincarnate-christ 

“Was Melchizedek the preincarnate Christ?”

No, Melchizedek was not the same person as Jesus, contrary to a rather popular notion that stems from a misunderstanding of certain passages in Hebrews 7.

Melchizedek is first mentioned in Genesis 14. Abram (later called Abraham), returning from the rescue of his nephew (Lot), encountered this ancient dignitary who was king of Salem (early Jerusalem; cf. Psa. 76:2).

In addition to being king, he was described as “priest of God Most High” (Gen. 14:18).

His stature is revealed in that he “blessed” Abraham (the greater always blesses the lesser), and to Melchizedek, the patriarch paid tithes, i.e., gave to the king-priest a tenth of his spoils (the lesser tithes to the greater).

The writer of Hebrews uses this incident (together with a prophecy from Psalm 110), to demonstrate the superiority of the priesthood of Christ to that of the Levitical system (Heb. 7:4-10). Beyond that, there were some similarities between Melchizedek and Christ, so that it may be said that the former was a “type” (a picture or symbolic preview) of Jesus. That does not mean, however, that they were the same person. In fact, the sacred text indicates otherwise.

V3 is… Well, just what up with v3?

Here's the verse: Without father or mother, without genealogy, without beginning of days or end of life, resembling the Son of God, he remains a priest forever.

It may mean no record, not really none. Mel's "like" Jesus not Jesus.
More from https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/356-was-melchizedek-the-preincarnate-christ 

Melchizedek was “without father, without mother” (Heb. 7:3a).

The meaning is this: his divine role was not genealogically derived, not handed down from his parents. So, neither was Jesus’ priesthood determined by a physical lineage, as in the case of the Aaronic priests (Ex. 28:1; Num. 3:10).

Among the Tel el Armarna tablets (discovered in Egypt in 1887), there are several letters written to a Pharaoh from one Ebed-tob, who is called “king of Uru-Salim.” The Canaanite king tells the Egyptian ruler that he did not receive his reign from his father and mother, but it had been conferred upon him by “the Mighty King.” This helps to illustrate the phraseology in the book of Hebrews (see A.H. Sayce, “Melchizedek,” Dictionary of the Bible, James Hastings, Ed., Edinburgh: T.&T. Clark, 1908, III, p. 335).

Melchizedek’s administration was without “beginning of days” and “end of life” (Heb. 7:3b).

Again, the meaning is that his priesthood was not for a fixed term (as in the case of the Levitical priests). Under the Old Testament regime, priests began their service at the age of 30, and the Levites served from age 30 to 50 (cf. Num. 4:3ff; 8:24-25).

Apparently, however, there was no chronological limitation with reference to this “priest of Most High God” who reigned in Salem. Again, in this regard, he foreshadowed Christ, who serves continually as our priest throughout the Christian age.

That Melchizedek was not the same person as Jesus is evident in that he is said to be “like unto” the Son of God (Heb. 7:3c).

The participle aphomoioo denotes a comparison (e.g., a “copy” or “facsimile” – J.H. Thayer, Greek-English Lexicon, Edinburgh: T.&T. Clark, 1958, pp. 89-90). The term becomes irrelevant if the two persons were the same in identity.

The point is made again in verse 15. Jesus is a priest after the “likeness” of Melchizedek. D.W. Burdick observes:

“The verb aphomoioo always assumes two distinct and separate identities, one of which is a copy of the other. Thus Melchizedek and the Son of God are represented as two separate persons, the first of which resembled the second” (“Melchizedek,” The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia – Revised, G.W. Bromiley, Ed., Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986, Vol. 3, p. 313).

What’s the significance of Abe’s act of tithing?
Tithing is always from the lesser person to the greater person.
Mel expected tithes and he blessed Abraham.

Where in Scripture is tithing required by The Law?
Deuteronomy 14:22-29/Malachi 4/Leviticus 18 and 27.
There are three types of tithes required.
The Levites' Tithe--Leviticus 18:2. This is needed because they Levites had no other source of income.
The Lord's Tithe--Leviticus 27:30
The 3-year Tithe. Deuteronomy 14:22-29

Mel’s whole story is in Gen 14:18-20. Why spend so much time on a minor OT character? <see next section, too>
See the above and

A distinction between Christ and Melchizedek is vividly seen in Psalm 110.

In this text, Jehovah addresses David’s “Lord” (Jesus) in the second person, while the reference to Melchizedek is in the third person (v. 4). [Note: See Matthew 22:42-44 for Jesus’ application of this psalm to himself.]

Accordingly, one should not make the mistake of identifying the ancient king-priest of Salem as Jesus Christ.

Mel’s blessing of Abe is emphasized here. Why?

Blessings are always OF the lesser BY the greater.

Chapter 7 Vv 11-22

What does v12 mean?

For when the priesthood is changed, the law must be changed also.
Aaron's priesthood is in the Law. 
For a non-Levite to be a priest, the Law had to change.
Jesus death fulfilled the Old Testament Law and brought a new Law into place.
Since the Law changed, requirements for the priesthood changed, too.

We Got This Far This Week

If you'd like a PDF of the pages of questions in table form with room for you to write answers, email me at 

chuckdowning4@gmail.com/ 

Follow me on Twitter: @CRDowningAuthor and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CRDowningAuthor

My website is: www.crdowning.com

I'd appreciate your feedback as a comment on Blogger!